CUTWORMS
IN CORN
If corn
has emerged in good shape, cutworms are the next insect pest
to look out for. Cutworms can cause serious damage to corn in
the first couple of weeks after emergence, so it is important
to scout early- emerging fields for damage. Some damage to field
corn from cutworms occurs every year in Nebraska. Several different
species of cutworms can attack corn. The severity and the area
affected will vary greatly, and is dependent on species involved,
previous crop history, and weather conditions.
Cutworms that attack corn can be divided into two general categories
based on seasonal life cycles. Black cutworms do not overwinter
in Nebraska. Dingy, claybacked, darksided, sandhills, pale western,
and other species overwinter as partially grown larvae in the
soil.
Since black cutworms do not overwinter in Nebraska, they are
dependent on spring weather conditions, primarily prevailing
southerly winds, to bring them into our state. Nebraska is on
the western edge of the black cutworm's area of influence, and
they are rarely found west of the 100th meridian. Because of
their cutting habits and the possibility that large numbers
can be transported to Nebraska if favorable weather conditions
occur, they have the most potential to cause a widespread problem.
Light traps and pheromone traps have been used to monitor the
flight patterns and populations of black cutworms. Remember,
the presence of moths in a trap only indicates potential problems
and is no guarantee that extensive damage will occur. Trap counts
are more useful in alerting growers and consultants as to when
to begin scouting efforts.
The last few weeks have been dominated by low pressure systems
bringing up moisture on southerly winds from the Gulf of Mexico.
This is favorable for black cutworm establishment. Some pheromone
traps in eastern Nebraska have caught significant numbers of
black cutworm moths. Corn planted into heavy residue, or fields
with winter annuals, or fields planted into spring-killed alfalfa
(that may attract egg laying moths) have a slightly higher potential
for cutworms. When weeds are destroyed mechanically or by herbicides,
cutworms will feed on the newly emerging corn. Because most
damage from cutworms occurs roughly in the first week or two
after emergence, growers should begin to scout fields as soon
as possible after emergence.
Cutworms that overwinter as larvae generally prefer to lay eggs
in the fall in green
vegetation such as small grain stubble, legumes, rye, and pasture.
The eggs hatch and the larvae feed on the vegetation present
before overwintering. In the spring, after the previous crop
is removed and the corn emerges, the cutworms will transfer
their feeding activity to the corn. Recent experience has been
that corn planted into alfalfa that has been killed in the spring
has a greater potential for cutworm problems.
Tillage has minimal effect on cutworm populations. If fields
are tilled before black cutworm migration, it may limit egg
laying in those fields. Cutworms already in the field may suffer
some mortality by mechanical action, but there is no guarantee
that tillage by itself will eliminate cutworm problems. Many
cutworm problems have occurred in fields that have been tilled.
It is extremely rare to experience cutworm problems in continuous
corn. Corn stubble is not a preferred egg-laying site. Potential
problems in continuous corn may be the result of a previous
year's late season flush of weeds, an interseeding of a fall
cover crop such as rye, or a flush of winter annuals this spring,
which possibly attract egg-laying moths.
Managing
Cutworms in Corn
Several
options exist for the grower who wants to manage cutworms in
corn. Since a vast majority of corn acreage is not affected
by cutworms, the most economically sound practice is to scout
for cutworm damage as soon as the corn emerges and apply a rescue
treatment if necessary. Early detection of a problem is essential
because most of the cutting occurs within 7 days of plant emergence.
Generally, a rescue treatment should be considered if 5% or
more (an average of 1 plant or more in a set of 20) cutting
is observed and the worms are one inch or less in length.
As we are moving toward more reliance on pre and post emergence
herbicides, it is becoming more common to apply a liquid insecticide
in with the herbicide as an "insurance" treatment.
Competition is driving the price of some insecticides down,
and some treatments can be applied for as little as $3.00 an
acre. While on the surface this may appear to be an attractive
option, in fact this will be a money loser in the vast majority
of cases. Three dollars an acre to control something that isn't
there is still $3.00 an acre lost. Another unfortunate occurrence
of price competition is the overstating of insecticide properties
in regards to efficacy or residual activity. In some areas of
the state certain insecticides are being touted as giving a
30-day residual. Since most cutworm treatments are surface applied
and not incorporated, sunlight, heat and water will begin to
break down these chemicals immediately after they are applied.
Expect no more than 5 to 10 days of killing activity even under
the best of conditions.
Rescue treatments are effective in controlling soil cutworms.
Ambush 2E, Asana XL, Baythroid 2, Capture 2E, Lorsban 4E, Mustang
Max, Warrior and Pounce 3.2EC will all give satisfactory control
as postemergence sprays. If the soil is dry or crusted, rotary
hoeing immediately before or after Lorsban application may enhance
control. The other insecticides are pyrethroids and should not
be incorporated. See a full list of products and rates at our
website http://entomology.unl.edu/instabls/cutworms.htm. For
more information on cutworm biology and control see NebGuide
G93-1153-A, Corn Cutworms. (KJ)
INTEGRATED
MANAGEMENT OF EASTERN RED CEDAR IN PASTURE
Eastern
redcedar (Juniperus virginiana L.) is one of 13 juniper species
native to the United States. It is the most widespread tree
sized conifer and is native to every state east of the 100th
meridian. Throughout this vast range, eastern redcedar grows
on many soils and under varying climatic conditions.
Eastern redcedar can be a serious problem on grasslands where
it competes very effectively with pasture species for light
and nutrients reducing forage production. Heavy tree infestation
interferes with livestock handling too. These adverse effects
often lower rental rates or sale prices of infested grassland.
On many sites complete coverage by eastern redcedar can be expected,
resulting in total loss of production.
Control measures should be initiated as soon as possible, both
to improve effectiveness and reduce total costs. In most cases,
a single control measure can't provide long-term management
of this species. However, if the control practices are integrated
in a systematic manner, significant advances can be achieved.
Methods of control must be based on an integrated management
approach, which includes a combination of manual, mechanical,
cultural, biological and chemical control methods.
Manual control involves pulling or digging trees. It can be
very effective for small areas and is most efficient on trees
up to 2 feet tall. Mechanical control methods such as cutting
or mowing involve use of various hand held or motor-powered
tools. Mowing of short trees can be also utilized as part of
the regular cutting and haying process. The overall key to success
in cutting or mowing is to cut the tree at the soil surface
or below the lowest branches. Red cedar trees that are cut low
should not regrow. In addition, if the goal is to just reduce
overall number of trees and reduce further spreading (eg. management
of wildlife habitat), it is recommended to cut only female trees
(the trees that produce berry-like fruits).
Biological weed control or bio-control is the use of natural
enemies to reduce weed populations to economically acceptable
levels. In the case of red cedar control, goats can be utilized
as an effective bio-control agent for trees that are up to 3ft
tall. Goats are known browsers, whose diet consists 75% of non-grassy
species, which means they will not compete with your cattle
for grass. They are also alternative tool for control of many
noxious weeds, especially for leafy spurge. Keeping several
goats at your pasture can help control many non-grassy species
including red cedar trees.
Prescribed fire can be also used. This method is inexpensive
and effective against smaller trees. However, its effectiveness
declines as tree size increases. Adequate fine fuel (usually,
last year's dead grass) is necessary for satisfactory results.
Safety also is a concern since many managers lack experience
with fire and the equipment required to conduct fires.
Chemical control should be also considered. Herbicides should
be viewed as just another tool in the integrated approach tool
box. Herbicides can be used for both 'individual-tree' spraying
and broadcast application.
Individual tree treatments:
Currently there are several herbicides suggested for individual
tree treatments in spring or fall. Examples include Tordon 22K,
Velpar-L and Spike 20P. Tordon 22K can be used as a spot gun
application of soil around the tree before rainfall. Rainfall
will help uptake the chemical. The recommended rate is about
1 cc's (ml) per foot of tree height. Cost of Tordon 22K is about
$85 per gallon. It would costs about $65 per acre plus labor
($15 /hour) to spray 1500 trees that are about 2 feet tall.
Velpar-L can be also used through a spot gun in spring at the
rate of 4 cc's (ml) per every inch of tree diameter. Cost of
Velpar is about $65 per gallon. Spike 20P is another alternative
but only in non-crop areas as a total vegetation control at
the rate of 0.5 oz per every inch of stem diameter. Cost of
Spike 20P is about $9 per pound of product.
We have also conducted a preliminary study of individual tree
treatments at two locations (Center and St. James) in northeastern
Nebraska. Excellent tree control (>90%) was achieved with
Plenum at 1.5 % volume per volume (v/v), Grazon P+D at 2.0%
(v/v) and Tordon 22K at 1.0% v/v (Table 1). All other treatments
provided poor control (<50%). Grass injury in the form of
temporary yellowing and burning of top growth was evident among
all treatments especially for Tordon 22K (Table1). Cost of Grazon
P+D and Tordon 22 K ranged from $11-$16 per acre (Table 1).
Plenum and Garlon are experimental products; therefore they
are not available for purchase.
Here are a few practical hints: (1) To help you determine volume
per volume basis, for example the 1% v/v equals 1 gall of product
per 100 gallon of water (eg in large tanks). For smaller back
pack sprayers use an equivalent of 1.3 oz of product per every
gallon of water. (2) Apply about 1.5 oz of the above prepared
spray solution per every foot of tree height. Walk around the
tree and just spray enough to get a glisten (shine) on the leaf
surface. Solution dripping off the tree indicates a rate that
is too high and a waste of time and money. (3) As an example,
we calculated that 1 gallon of spray solution should cover 15
individual trees that are 6 feet tall at 20 PSI and nozzles
XR8002.
Table 1: Percent red cedar control and grass injury at 100 days
after treatment in individual-tree study at two locations (Center
and St. James).
|
|
|
|
Center
|
St.
James
|
Center
|
St.
James
|
|
aProduct
name
|
Dose
(%v/v)
|
b$$/acre
|
Cedar
Control (%)
|
Grass
injury (%)
|
|
|
|
1.
Plenum
|
0.5
|
-
|
30
|
3
|
22
|
15
|
|
2 Plenum
|
1.0
|
-
|
84
|
69
|
37
|
42
|
|
3.
Plenum
|
1.5
|
-
|
96
|
89
|
66
|
45
|
|
4.
Garlon EV
|
1.0
|
-
|
25
|
14
|
13
|
7
|
|
5.
Grazon P+D
|
2.0
|
11
|
90
|
90
|
44
|
52
|
|
6.
Tordon 22K
|
1.0
|
16
|
94
|
92
|
74
|
64
|
|
7.
Untreated check
|
|
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
a Treatments
1-4 are experimental premixes
b Cost per acre not available for treatments 1-4 because they
are not marketed products yet.
Broadcast treatments:
In general the taller the trees the poorer the control. Excellent
control (>90%) of up to 1 foot tall trees was achieved with
Plenum (5pts), Grazon P+D (6pt & 8pt) and Tordon 22K (2pts)
at both locations (Table 2). Same treatments, however, provided
poor control (<50%) of taller trees (>2 feet). Plenum
at 4 and 5 pts/acre provided good to excellent control of up
to 2 ft tall trees. All other treatments provided poor control
(<50%) regardless of the tree height (Table 2). Physical
removal treatment (#10), provided best control (100%), however
it was the most expensive method.
Cost of Grazon P+D and Tordon 22 K ranged from $21-$26 per acre.
Plenum and Garlon are experimental products and can not be purchased.
Cost of physical removal treatment was about $120 per acre.
It was based on a calculation assuming that $8 hours of work
was needed to cut 1500 trees, 2 feet tall, per one acre and
an hourly labor cost of $15. For illustration purposes, 1500
trees per acre are equivalent of 1 tree per 3 square yard. Grass
injury in the form of temporary yellowing and burning of top
growth was evident among all treatments.
Table 2: Percent control of eastern red cedar at two locations
(Center and St. James) as influenced by the tree height in broadcast
study at 100 DAT.
Tree height at Center Tree height at St.James
|
|
|
|
Tree
height at Center
|
Tree
height at St.James
|
|
aTreatments
|
Dose/acre
|
b$$/acre
|
0-1ft
|
1-2
|
2-4ft
|
0-1ft
|
1-2ft
|
2-4ft
|
>4ft
|
|
1. Plenum
|
3
pt
|
-
|
40
|
33
|
13
|
40
|
33
|
26
|
12
|
|
2. Plenum
|
4
pt
|
-
|
-
|
96
|
60
|
73
|
59
|
27
|
15
|
|
3. Plenum
|
5
pt
|
-
|
95
|
85
|
43
|
87
|
70
|
23
|
5
|
|
4. Garlon GS
|
4
pt
|
-
|
15
|
8
|
37
|
33
|
19
|
7
|
4
|
|
5. Garlon EV
|
4
pt
|
-
|
15
|
12
|
10
|
30
|
20
|
11
|
7
|
|
6. Garlon EV
|
6
pt
|
-
|
12
|
20
|
10
|
30
|
16
|
8
|
4
|
|
7. Grazon P+D
|
6
pt
|
21
|
95
|
47
|
18
|
93
|
53
|
40
|
16
|
|
8. Grazon P+D
|
8
pt
|
26
|
96
|
76
|
33
|
88
|
86
|
40
|
18
|
|
9. Tordon 22k
|
2
pt
|
22
|
95
|
50
|
16
|
79
|
63
|
42
|
25
|
|
10.
cPhysical removal
|
|
120
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
|
11. Untreated check
|
|
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
a Treatments
1-6 are experimental premixes
b Cost per acre not available for treatments 1-6 because they
are not marketed products yet.
c Physical removal was done by hand held saw and assuming labor
cost of 15/hour
What
to do with "standing dead-trees":
Commonly
asked question is: What to do with the trees that died as the
result of herbicide application. This is especially true for
taller trees (> 4ft). Of course they can be removed within
the same season. However, if that was the original intension,
the chemicals should have not been used. Do yourself a favor,
save some money. Just cut the trees at the ground level. They
will not re-grow, however watch for stumps, they can puncture
vehicle tires.
Standing dead trees will reduce the aesthetic value of the land,
however there are several benefits of leaving dead trees stand
for several years: (a) they will protect the grass to regrow
and re-establish on those individual spots, (b) help against
soil erosion and (c) protect against wind or snow. Trees that
are 4-8 feet do not have much of the red heartwood tissue so
they will naturally deteriorate within 3-6 years.