2002 Nebraska Insecticide Evaluations

Researcher(s):  Keith Jarvi    

Location:  Dean Eckstrom field north of McLean, Nebraska

Evaluation:  White Grub treatment (Bayer)

Species:  Still to be identified

 

 

Hybrid

Novartis 58D1

 

Row Spacing

30 inches

 

Planting Date

6 May

 

Planter

John Deere MaxEmergeŽ, 2 row

 

Planting Depth

2 inches

 

Planting Rate:

 

 

Application Equipment

Aztec 2.1 G granules at planting: Planter mounted cone-belt system,  in-furrow in front of press wheel

Leverage 2.7 SE applied with microtube in-furrow in front of press wheel at 5 gallons solution/acre, 24 psi

Seed treatments were applied by Bayer on N58D1 and sent to us.

 

Field Preparation

Disk once previous to planting

 

            Fertilization

 

 

            Herbicides

 

 

Cultivation

 

 

Previous Crop

2001 corn replanted to soybean due to extensive stand loss

 

Soil Type

 

 

Organic Matter

 

 

ph

 

 

Field History

Corn-soybean rotation multiple years

 

Irrigation

None

 

Plot Direction

East-West

 

Plot Length

45 ft

Experimental Design and Evaluation

 

            Randomized complete block with 4 replications, single row, no border rows between treatments

            Ratings:  Plant population in middle 30 ft of row

            Plant populations were taken on 7, 10, 14, 17 and 25 June

Statistical evaluation based on 25 June count. 

           

Comments:  A 15 acre area of this field was nearly 100% destroyed by white grubs in 2001.  Soybeans were replanted in the area in June of 2001 and were not damaged by the grubs.  Enough grubs were left in 2002 to give us a good screening experiment.  Stunting occurred throughout the rating period and yield will be taken in October.  No phytotoxic symptoms were present, except those caused by the grubs (stunting and purpling caused by lack of root system).  Rainfall was not recorded but virtually no rain fell during the planting to recording period.  All treatments were significantly better than the untreated check and there were no significant differences between treatments.

 

 


Application Methods:

 


ST = Seed Treatment

IF = In-furrow in front of press wheel at planting time

MT = Microtube at planting

 

Insecticide Screening McLean, NE 2002

Plant Population per 30 ft of row (25 June)

 

 

Treatment

Application Method

Rate

 

Plant Population

LO263

ST

0.08 ke

37.25 a

Clothianidin

ST

0.25 ke

37.25 a

Leverage 2.7 SE

IF MT

2.5 fl. oz./1000 ft of row

35.50 a

Aztec 2.1 G

IF

5.025 oz/1000 ft of row

35.50 a

LO263

ST

0.125 ke

35.25 a

Baythroid

IF MT

1 oz/acre

34.75 a

Gaucho

ST

0.165 ke

33.25 a

Cruiser

ST

0.133 ke

33.00 a

Untreated

 

 

28.00   b

Untreated

 

 

24.50   b

 

Means with the same letter are not significantly different. (LSD = 4.4208; alpha = 0.05)