Printable Report (pdf format)

Background information pertaining to white grub insecticide experiments conducted at the Dean Eckstrom field north of McLean, NE 2002.

Species
Still to be identified


Agronomic
Hybrid:                          Novartis 58D1
Row Spacing:                30 inches
Planting Date:                6 May
Planter:                         John Deere Maxemerge, 2 row
Planting Depth:              2 inches
Application Equipment:

Granules at planting: Planter mounted cone-belt system, all in-furrow in front of press wheel
All liquids applied with microtube in-furrow in front of press wheel at 5 gallons solution/acre, 24 psi|
Seed treatments were applied by the companies on N58D1 and sent to us.

Previous Crop:                 2001 corn replanted to soybean due to extensive stand loss
Tillage:                            Disk once previous to planting
Field History:                   Corn-soybean rotation multiple years
Irrigation:                         None
Plot Direction:                  East-West
Plot length:                      45 ft             

Experimental Design and Evaluation

Randomized complete block with 4 replications, single row, no border rows between treatments
Ratings:  Plant population in middle 30 ft of row
Plant populations were taken on 7, 10, 14, 17 and 25 June
Statistical evaluation based on 25 June count.          

Comments:  A 15 acre area of this field was nearly 100% destroyed by white grubs in 2001.  Soybeans were replanted in the area in June of 2001 and were not damaged by the grubs.  Enough grubs were left in 2002 to give us a good screening experiment.  Stunting occurred throughout the rating period and yield will be taken in October.  No phytotoxic symptoms were present, except those caused by the grubs (stunting and purpling caused by lack of root system).  Rainfall was not recorded but virtually no rain fell during the planting to recording period.  Rainfall from Concord is given but less rain probably fell on this plot

Keith Jarvi, White Grub Insecticide Experiment, McLean, NE 2002.  

Application Methods:

ST = Seed Treatment
IF = In-furrow in front of press wheel at planting time
MT = Microtube at planting
Insecticide Screening McLean, NE 2002
Plant Population per 30 ft of row (25 June)

  Treatment

Application Method

Rate

Plant Population

Gaucho

ST

0.165 ke

37.50 a

Aztec 2.1 G

IF

6.7 oz/1000 ft of row

36.25 ab

Clothianidin

ST

0.25 ke

36.00 ab

Proshield

ST

3.5 g ai 100kg seed

36.00 ab

Force 3 G

IF

4 oz /1000 ft of row

35.75 ab

Lorsban 15 G

IF

8 oz/1000 ft of row

35.25 ab

Cruiser 12.5 bag 6

ST

12.5 g ai/100 kg seed

35.00 abc

Fortress 2.5 G

IF

7.4 oz/1000 ft of row

34.75 abc

Counter 20 CR

IF

6 oz/1000 ft of row

34.50 abc

F0570

IF MT

1.44 oz/acre

34.25 abc

Capture 2E

IF MT

0.15 oz/1000 ft of row

34.00 abc

Icon (Regent)

ST

50g ai/100 kg seed

32.25   bcd

Cruiser 50 bag 3

ST

50 g ai/100 kg seed

32.25   bcd

Pounce 3.2 EC

IF MT

4 oz/acre

31.00      cd

Regent

IF MT

 

29.75        d

Untreated

 

 

29.75        d

Means with the same letter are not significantly different. (LSD = 4.1069; alpha = 0.05)

Precipitation Total, Concord, NE 2002                                                     
January Total
0.74  
February Total
1.41   
March Total 
1.21
April 
1 0.04
11       0.12
12   0.14
13     0.10
17 0.68
21 0.95
23 0.24
27 0.38
28 0.49
29 0.05
30 0.11
April Total 
3.30
May    
1  0.29
2  0.27
7  0.20
8 0.10
11 0.89
12 0.70
13 0.02
22 0.04
27 0.03
28 0.13
May Total
2.67
June    
4 0.27
5 0.10
8 0.80
9 0.04
11 1.25
12 0.13
June Total 
2.59
July 3
0.16
10        0.61  
July total until rating
0.77